Worksite International
1213 Miles Avenue Pacific Grove, CA 93950
phone: 831-648-8724
fax: 831-648-8330

 

Worksite International News

 

Worksite International News: 

Archive Articles From Previous Issues

 

Table of Contents (By Topic)

 

Feature Articles

OSHA Updates

Product Features

Spotlight On...

FYI Web Site

 

Feature Articles

 

OSHA Updates

 

Product Features

 

FYI Web Sites

 

Back to Table Of Contents

 

 

Feature Articles

Looking into the Eye of the Reform (SB899)

 

In this issue, we will discuss the numerous reforms passed this April regarding workers’ compensation and the impact it will have on your business.

In a historical move this past April 19, 2004, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger achieved bipartisan agreement on workers’ compensation reform measures to help the state’s ailing system. The comprehensive reform package was developed behind closed door sessions primarily between labor and management teams, leaving out the special interests of insurers and attorneys. The result was a reform package that is likely to respond to the concerns of the California employer and offer a number of concessions to injured workers in the coming months and years. The framework has been developed but in many of the reforms, details still need to be worked out over the next year.

The reform package contained in SB899 by Senator Poochigan features changes to numerous areas and also repeals a number of past legislations that were designed to save money but back fired after they were implemented. Not all areas of the reform will be discussed in detail.

Indemnity Payments and Statewide Fixes:

●Creation of fair and impartial treatment under the law for employers by refining the “Liberal Construction Statute”.

● Further the definition of “Cure and Relieve” by conforming to medical treatment based on guidelines in the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine’s (ACOEM) Occupational Medicine Practice Guidelines.

●Elimination of subjective “work capacity guidelines” and replacement with objective earning capacity ratings as it pertains to permanent disability awards using the AMA guidelines for objective impairment descriptions and the Rand report.

●Prohibit multiple permanent disability awards for the same injury by assigning liability for only that portion caused directly by the current work place injury.

●Prohibit against workers receiving disability payments for injuries or portions of injuries occurring outside of work. Physicians will need to determine the percentage of permanent disability that was caused by the present work-related injury and the portion caused by the non-work related activity/injury.

●Caps temporary disability payments after 2 years (with some exceptions for severe injuries).

●Eliminates the onerous penalty provision so that penalties are assessed on the actual late payment rather than the entire claim.

●Insurers must inspect the safety program for high hazard workplaces with an experience modification factor of 2.0 or >.

MEDICAL TREATMENT:

●Provisions that require workers to use Employer specified network physicians for the entire duration of their treatment to allow for near 100% total medical control of the injured workers claim.

●Establishment of an independent medical review process so that doctors make treatment decisions, not lawyers. Allows injured worker to seek alternative opinion regarding a disputed treatment outside of network.

●Provisions of objective AMA guidelines on evaluating impairment ratings to improve the consistency of disability awards.

●Permanent and total repeal of the primary treating physician presumption.

●Requires that workers seek immediate medical treatment, reducing the potential for expensive litigation in the system. Requires employers and insurers to immediately pay for medical treatment up to a maximum of $10,000 once an injured workers has filed a claim.

●Shifts in benefits from minor to more severe injuries resulting in reduced permanent partial disability for less severe injuries and an increase in benefits for those with more severe injuries.

This list highlights the most significant reforms contained in SB899. Many of these go into effect immediately, while others begin in 2005. Understanding the impact of the reforms on your organization’s workers’ compensation policies and procedures are essential. Employers’ are encouraged to update their workers’ compensation management programs to reflect these changes. For additional information, contact any of the following:

Alison Heller-Ono MSPT, CIE, CDA, CMC; 888-288-4463

California Coalition on Workers’ Compensation; 916-441-4111

Administrative Director, Division of Workers’ Compensation, Sacramento, CA.

Forming Medical Networks:

Beginning in January 2005, employers may establish networks composed of both occupational and non-occupational treating doctors (25%). This applies mostly to self-insured entities. Employers with workers’ comp. insurance should rely on their insurer to form the appropriate network. The network should provide a sufficient number of physicians and other health care providers (HCPs) to provide timely treatment. The employer or insurer have the exclusive right to decide which providers are in the network. Furthermore, compensation to HCPs will not be based on reducing, delaying or denying treatment. The medical network (MN) will use treatment protocols in accordance with the ACOEM guidelines or other accepted guidelines developed by the Admin. Director. Only the licensed physician in the appropriate scope of practice can modify, delay or deny a request for authorization for treatment.

What all this means for employers is more control over the care of your injured employees. The formation of MN will allow the employer to select the physicians and other providers including PTs, OTs, etc. who are qualified and can demonstrate the expertise, experience and knowledge needed to medically manage workers’ comp. claims. Employers are encouraged to seek out providers that understand work injuries, ergonomics and return to work.

Return to Work Incentives

SB899 has included some additional incentives for those employers who actively seek to return injured workers back to work. For those employers with 50 or fewer full time employees, the law provides for reimbursement for worksite modifications to accommodate the employee’s RTW. The program will reimburse up to $1250 of expenses to accommodate a TD worker or $2500 for a PD worker. Another incentive for employers who return PD employees back to work is a 15% reduction in the weekly rate of the payments of the PD award. If no RTW is offered, the PD award is increased by 15%. This adjustment only applies to >50 employees. Further details will be forthcoming from the Admin Director as to how small employers can apply for the refund.

 

 

MOUSING AROUND THE KEYBOARD: Part II

In our last issue (Spring/Fall 2003) we explored the hazards of pointing of pointing device use while keyboarding . This included a variety of common postures and habits users perform that could lead to injury while using these devices. In this issue, we identify a variety of alternative solutions to reduce and or eliminate pointing device use or increase the overall comfort of the user with the device.

There are an endless variety of pointing devices on the market today for computer users to select from making the choice a difficult one. However, when pain develops in the upper extremity and hands from use of these hand tools, the choice becomes even more difficult. An ergonomic analysis of the situation is strongly advised to determine whether the problem is a result of placement of the tool, the work surface, the tool itself or the user’s body mechanics with the tool. If the situation warrants a change in the tool, the end user should be aware of the variety of options in the marketplace today. Below is a list of just a few options to assist in making the change to healthier pointing and clicking.

 

In some cases it is necessary to completely eliminate the need to grasp and click the mouse. One such product is RSIGuard (www.rsiguard.com) which is an integrated approach that is designed to reduce repetitive computer activity. A unique feature is the AutoClick which eliminates the need to do two of the most demanding activities of grasping and clicking the mouse. Autoclick’s automatic clicking option simulates a mouse click whenever you stop moving the mouse. The feature allows the user to also assign hotkeys on the keyboard that allow the user to perform single clicks, double clicks, triple clicks, right/left click and right drag lock with simple key presses further reducing the repetitive nature of mousing.

Another option is voice activation or recognition software which has become increasingly advanced over the years to assist hand injured users.

This option works to eliminate mouse use to the extent feasible. Products available today include Dragon Naturally Speaking Voice Dictation Software and the Qpointer. These programs require time to establish voice recognition and often after use begins, the work product requires editing via the keyboard and mouse. None-the-less with a little patience time and a private area, this option can be a livelihood saver.

If the tool is identified as the problem, then seeking out an alternative mouse might be the right solution. There are now dozens of alternative shapes to support the hand more effectively. These options include the following:

The Perfit Mouse by Contour Designs offers a variety of sizes from x-small to x-large and right/left hand. use.

The 3M Renaissance mouse is an upright “handshake” design.

The Goldtouch mouse fits in the palm of the right hand with a curved design, easy grip ridges and scroll button.

The Whale mouse by Humanscale fits any size hand, left or right and offers a low profile.

Optical and cordless mice may help to ease the function of pushing and moving the mouse and allow more convenient placement of the tool.

Trackballs are entirely different in that the user no longer pushes or grasps the tool. However moving the ball with the fingers and hands, while offering different mechanics can sometimes lead to aggravation of the hand if safe practices are not observed.

An entirely different line of products is now available which avoids the traditional  hand use associated with mousing. This includes the Rollermouse by Contour Designs which centers the pointing device under the space bar and eliminates the need to reach left or right. Other options include touch pads, optical pens and pads for CAD use, foot pedal pointing devices and the HeadMouse

. The Contour Rollermouse

Whichever product you choose, keep in mind the need for proper placement, a “warming up” period to get used to the alternative design and safe work practices. In many cases, users may need to try more than one device. Also, keyboard shortcuts are a great way to reduce mousing effort.

To request a free copy of the complete 4 page newsletter, email alisonh@worksiteinternational.com and we will put you on our mailing list and send you our most recent copy.

MOUSING AROUND THE KEYBOARD: Part 1

Part I: This article explores the hazards of pointing device use while keyboarding and identifies a number of habits, postures and positional causes that contribute to the onset of right upper extremity RMIs.

OSHA statistics indicate most work injuries are related to high risk activities such as those that require forceful or heavy exertions. These overexertions are the leading cause of back injury today, especially in manufacturing and heavy industry. However, running closely behind is the trauma associated with manual tasks that require repetitive motion. OSHA statistics

indicate a significant level of RMIs associated with sedentary to light tasks such as keyboarding and mouse use. One might ask how can such a simple task lead to injury and cost so much?

First, it is important to understand physically what occurs with an overuse injury, especially one related to mouse use. The most common injuries are

Trigger Finger

Wrist Extensor Tendinitis

Elbow Extensor Tendinitis

Rotator Cuff Tendinitis

Tension Neck Syndrome

There are others that may result, including various nerve compressions. All of these are significant injuries that can result from repeated biomechanical stress over an extended period of time resulting from pointing device use.

Quantifying the amount of exposure such as how long and how often the tool is used is important. Users exceeding 2-4 hours cumulative daily use are likely more vulnerable to these injuries. The software format is also important.

Many soft wares rely highly on pointing device use such as database programs, customer service software, graphic design programs and internet searching.

Using the pointing device has significant biomechanical forces requiring sustained grip along with repeated finger motion when using the traditional mouse. Trackball mechanics vary based on the position of the roller ball, either top mounted or thumb driven. None-the-less, both tools drive repeated finger and thumb motions. The primary difference is the traditional mouse requires a firm grip to stabilize the mouse or to move and drag it effectively.

Perhaps the most significant stressors come from the postures assumed while mousing around the keyboard. Below is a series of metaphors for typical mousing postures:

The Mouse Chaser: Typically the mouse is used on the work surface along with the keyboard. The user drives the mouse forward on the desk until it is at a maximum full arm reach, often resulting in forward trunk inclination and poor back support.

The Rotating Mouse: Typically the mouse is placed on a keyboard tray that is >26” long and often set too low. The mouse is placed to the far right beyond the 10 key of the keyboard. The resulting posture is an open elbow angle with significant right shoulder external rotation creating fatigue to the entire upper extremity including the neck.

The High Mouse: This posture results when the mouse is placed on the desk about 4-6” higher than the keyboard on the keyboard tray resulting in an extended arm reach.

The Anchored Mouse: This often occurs simultaneously with the other mousing postures identified. This occurs when the arm is fully extended or the elbow is at an open angle and the user loads on the wrist, anchoring it on the mouse pad, palmrest or work surface. This results in contact stress to the wrist and creates a fulcrum of motion from the wrist forward allowing only the hand to move. The wrist is essentially locked in extension, limiting any upper extremity motion at the elbow or shoulder. This results in static muscle fatigue which ultimately can invoke the numerous injuries described earlier, including carpal tunnel syndrome.

DEVELOPING A QUALITY-DRIVEN ERGONOMICS PURCHASING PROCESS

This article is the last in a series on Quality.

Ergonomically designed products are regularly seen on T.V. and in the news these days. The term “ergonomic” is used in advertising daily to promote products that consumers use. From cars to refrigerators to pens to hair dryers to chairs, advertisers are defining products as “ergonomic” whether they are or not. When it comes to office furniture, accessories and supplies, just open any catalogue or walk down the aisle at Office Depot and any buyer is overwhelmed with “ergonomically-designed” products.

The trouble comes in not knowing which of these products are truly ergonomic. To really be able to identify an ergonomic product it should meet the following criteria:

It is comfortable to use.

It is easy to use and understand.

It’s use is practical.

It’s adjustable or can fit many different users.

It requires low force and encourages good postures when used.

So who is to decide whether a product is ergonomic or not? In most organizations, the decision comes directly from the Purchasing manager or supervisor. The challenge comes in selecting the right product for an employee (with a work injury) or even for a department or the entire organization.

Unfortunately, without the right training or knowledge regarding how to select an “ergonomic” product correctly, many Purchasing managers and supervisors make the wrong choice. In an effort to buy the right product for an injured worker, sometimes the wrong item is selected that doesn’t fit or in some circumstances, may even worsen the employees symptoms. Selecting the wrong product can often result in substantially more expense for the employer and frustration for the employee who usually must continue to use a product that is not quite meeting their needs.

Creating a quality-driven ergonomics purchasing process is one approach that should be considered. Such a program can help improve the success of selecting the right ergonomic product for the situation at hand.

In addition, it can help in a variety of other ways:

1. Assists in the budget management of purchases by controlling dollars spent and help obtain quantity discounts for multiple product purchases.

2. Provides quality control of products selected.

3. Offers consistency in product implementation throughout the organization so that each employee uses the same product.

4. Allows for better relationship development with vendors for improved customer service, quality control and maintenance.

5. Reduces errors in purchasing the wrong items when the organization allows purchasing at multiple levels.

Employers who rely on a Purchasing manager or supervisor to select and purchase ergonomic products are encouraged to send them to an Ergonomics training that offers education and information on how to identify and select the right ergonomic product for the right situation. Buyers should be aware of existing standards and guidelines that define quality furniture and other products for office or industrial use. The Human Factors and Ergonomics Society has recently released its draft standard on Human Factors Engineering of Computer Workstations which eventually will be submitted to the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) to become an official standard. This document is a revision of the previous ANSI/HFS 100 published in 1988. Another guideline for Visual Display Terminal furniture used in office work spaces is the guide put out recently by the Business and International Furniture Manufacturers Association or BIFMA. Both of these guides help the buyer to identify the criteria necessary to make the right selection. Having a good knowledge base and understanding of why products are designed the way they are will ultimately assure the proper selection and implementation of the selected product. By doing so, this further helps to define a quality ergonomics purchasing program.

Furthermore, employers are encouraged to develop an in-house guide for the selection and purchase of the most common ergonomic products used by the company. Experience in using the products successfully, receiving positive feedback from employees who use the products and appreciate the value of the product will help to identify which products are most appropriate for the guide. By creating an in-house selection guide, it can act as a standard for all those in the organization who must select and purchase product. This will enhance the quality of the ergonomics purchasing program by instilling consistency in the products used within the organization.

A good example is derived from a client who had established a furniture standards program that identified only certain manufacturers and work surface furniture that could be purchased. However, the standard was missing guidelines to select ergonomic chairs, articulating keyboard trays, telephone headsets, document supports, alternative keyboards and pointing devices, task lighting and other essential tools. The result was the organization had a multitude of poorly designed ergonomic chairs and keyboard trays that were not comfortable, useful or easy to operate based on the guidelines provided above. The employer took the time to create a quality-driven ergonomics purchasing process when they realized how much money had been spent on inferior product and how dissatisfied employees were with the existing equipment. Today, the employer has a comprehensive custom ergonomics purchasing guide that is available for product selection by purchasing, supervisors and others who make buying decisions driving quality deeper into the organizational process.

Finally, developing a quality-driven purchasing process that includes an in-house ergonomics purchasing guide will help to create a healthy and safe working environment for all employees. In addition, the guide should be considered a “work in progress” to be updated regularly to reflect changes in national furniture standards and ergonomic guidelines as well as changes to each vendor’s product line. By following through with a quality driven ergonomics purchasing process, the employer is guaranteed to save money, improve quality in product selection and increase employee satisfaction.

To learn more about how to create a quality driven ergonomics purchasing process, contact Worksite International for a complimentary onsite consultation and discussion of your current program. Call 888-288-4463.

Quality in Workers' Compensation Management

This article is the second in a series on Quality.

When it comes to managing a work injury at your workplace, how do supervisors know what to do? Does your organization offer a detailed quality oriented procedure of how supervisors should respond to employees concerns? Have supervisors undergone specific training identifying their role and responsibilities in the work injury process?

Often times, there are no written procedures or training to follow so supervisors respond based on their experience level or how they think they should handle the matter based on implied or unwritten policies at the workplace. Such accepted unwritten practices include," The worker must be 100% before returning to work” or “ We don’t provide modified duty”. Such practices are often biased, impractical and inappropriate. A worker is never able to give 100%, especially in a constrained system, which is likely how they were injured in the first place. People working in the system can only produce at the level inherent to the system. If there are internal problems with the work process, tools and materials or management, these will be exaggerated in the work injury process that does not offer quality integration.  

A supervisor’s response during the first minutes of the injury reporting process could be the difference between a successful outcome and a lawsuit. An approach that does not include quality management practices could lead to excessive claim costs, increased liability, reduced productivity, failed return to work and even a discrimination suit by the injured worker against the organization and the supervisor.

For the most part, employers have accepted work injury claims and costs as a part of doing business. This assumption has caused significant harm to employers impacting employee morale, production, medical expenses, increased liability and the bottom line. In fact, for every dollar spent on a work injury, employers spend an additional $2 to $5 on indirect costs according to Liberty Mutual, BLS and the National Academy of Social Insurance. An employer is advised to consider implementing a quality driven management program as it applies to work injury prevention and management. Management policies can limit quality or encourage improvement. This quality guideline or policy and procedure will help managers to realize the importance of responding appropriately to reduce the impact on the organization’s bottom line.

By implementing a workers’ compensation management policy based on quality, employers will assure reliability in the process, reduce failure and errors (lawsuits and failed RTW), save money and assure ease of implementation because of uniformity to the process. The “Fourteen Points to Quality Workers’ Compensation Management” is found below.

FOURTEEN POINTS TO

QUALITY WORKERS’ COMPENSATION MANAGEMENT

The “Fourteen Points” identified below are a derivative of Dr. W. Edwards Deming's, “14 Points for Management” from his book, Out of the Crisis published in 1982. The original 14 points served as the basis for transformation of American industry. It was meant to help solve big and small problems. Adoption and action of the 14 points signaled that management intended to stay in business with an aim to protect investors and jobs. Such a system formed the basis for lessons for top management in Japan in 1950 and in subsequent years. The 14 points listed below apply to large and small organizations, to service industry, manufacturing, private and public employers. As well, they apply to individuals, management, departments and divisions within a company. Implementation of the “Fourteen Points” below will drive quality change in your workers’ compensation process resulting in significant improvement in bottom line savings and organizational benefits.

1.Establish constancy of purpose towards managing work injuries with the aim of keeping the employee at work. Define in operational terms how managers should respond to employees who report work injury. Specify the standards and accepted practices.

2.Adopt the new philosophy. Unwritten rules and practices are no longer acceptable.

3.Don’t assume managers will do the right thing or will know what to do each time. Provide a support person or team to assure quality in the early stages. Use metrics to maintain quality standards.

4.Establish a long term relationship with a medical group that will support your quality workers’ compensation management process. Request the medical group show outcomes of medical care given to show healthcare cost management especially by supporting modified duty and return to work.

5.Improve safety on an ongoing basis to positively impact quality and employee productivity to decrease the cost of work injury.

6.Institute employee and manager training on the purpose and process of work injury management should one occur. Establish clear expectations up front to minimize inconsistency.

7.Institute leadership by improving supervision which ultimately is management’s responsibility.

8.Drive out fear so that employees report symptoms early, receive medical care promptly, are not demeaned by modified work activities and feel the need to file lawsuits resulting from inappropriate supervisor behaviors.

9.Break down barriers between departments so that Purchasing, Facilities, Information Systems and Human Resources all participate in the workers’ compensation process by addressing employee needs promptly. Use metrics to define expectations for each department.

10.Note accomplishments for employees and management for following safe work practices and implementing positive change in the workplace that drive health and safety initiatives.

11.Emphasize quality through the work injury process. Assure the injured worker and other workers understand the workers’ compensation management process by providing information in a variety of formats I.e. written, verbal, intranet.

12.Integrate the concept of pride of workmanship even in modified duty tasks by explaining to the employee the impact the task has on the organization.

13.Institute a vigorous program for (re)training people in new skills to facilitate job security and enhance employee value.

14.Create a structure in top management that will push every day on the above 13 points. Organize a task force with authority and obligation to act. Work with an experienced consultant for guidance. I.e. Ergonomics Task Force or Disability Management Team.

Quality and Ergonomics

 

This article is the first in a series on Quality and Ergonomics.

In a well organized system, all components work together to support each other. In a system that is well managed, everybody wins. According to Dr. W. Edwards Deming, the father of quality, as quality improves costs go down and productivity increases. Quality and productivity can be continually improved for better profitability. With this in mind, these are the same drivers that steer a company towards improving their workers’ compensation management and ergonomics process.

Many companies put the emphasis on employees to drive the change in safety behaviors and productivity improvements. For example, employers will provide employees with back safety belts to protect them from low back injuries. The reality is that some of the responsibility may come from the employee’s poor work practices of lifting, but it is more likely the set up of the task and how the work activity, tools and materials, and the layout were created by management that are likely driving the risk. Workers’ don’t determine the layout of the plant, the room temperature, the amount invested in research, development and training. They don’t buy the equipment, tools and materials or design products. They don’t determine 90% of things responsible for quality. Why then does management want to hold them responsible?

While workers play a critical roll in safety and ergonomics, it is management’s responsibility to change the system so that quality and productivity can improve and workers can experience pride of workmanship along with reduced risk of injury. In this way worker input becomes part of the process which in turn helps to drive quality.

What exactly is quality? According to Deming, quality is made in the boardroom. Quality is pride of workmanship. If quality is integral to the product or service, than quality is a function of management. As quality improves, costs go down and productivity increases. Quality and productivity can be continually improved.

With this in mind:

Quality= Pride of Workmanship.

Workmanship=the art or skill of a work man.

Ergonomics = the interrelationship of man and work (tools, materials handled, tasks performed).

Therefore…..Quality = Ergonomics.

It is management’s policies that can limit quality or encourage improvement. Most managers are in need of profound knowledge to maximize quality through workers’ compensation management and ergonomics. This knowledge can only be improved through training. Training will lower costs, reduce risk and improve the dollars saved in these areas. It is a critical part of improvement and is management’s responsibility, no other. Management training in these areas must be done right the first time or if learned incorrectly, economic hardships will follow further diminishing quality.

New Fed-OSHA Recordkeeping Rule

January 1, 2002 launches OSHA’s new injury/illness Recordkeeping rule which was revised to increase employee involvement, simplify forms and clarify regulatory requirements for reporting. The changes also enable employers to use computers to meet the written requirements. To summarize, Fed-OSHA has modified the following areas:

Simplification of forms 300 (Log), 300A (Incidence Report) and 301 (Summary)

Employee Privacy

Pre-existing Conditions        

Lost Workdays

Reporting of MSDs

The new forms 300, 300A and 301 are mandatory in recording injury/illnesses. Businesses are required to keep the old 200 forms for five years but do not need to update them. The new forms include information about how the injury occurred as well as new definitions for first aid, medical treatment, and restricted work.

Employees have access to form 301 to review their own injury/illness records. Privacy rights are extended to HIV,TB, sexual assaults or mental illness where employees can request their name not be used.

Pre-existing injury/illnesses require a “significant degree” of exacerbation in order for it to become work-related. “Significant

aggravation” of a pre-existing condition is considered work-related when it results in death, loss of consciousness, one or more days away from work, restricted work, job transfer or when medical treatment is required where none had been required previously.

The term “Lost Work Days” will now be replaced with “Days away from work, restricted work or job transfer”. There are also new rules for counting these days based on calendar days rather than work days. The day the injury or illness occurs is not counted as a day away from work and counting can stop after a maximum of 180 days away has been reached.

Another important change is expected to occur in January 2003 regarding the recording of Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs) as well as how Fed-OSHA will define MSDs. Work-related hearing loss will also be delayed until then as well. For now MSDs should be classified along side all other injuries, not segregated out.

In general, the new Recordkeeping rule was established to make the process of recording injuries and illnesses easier and more efficient. Data comparisons of past years to future years will be hampered because of the changes. However, incidence rates will be easier to calculate with the form 300A. There are a number of other changes as well. Additional information is found at www.osha.gov.

 

The 21st Century Tailor: The Ergonomist

Goodness of fit can be described as the closest match between worker and workplace to yield best practices and maximum productivity. It is something we knew very little about until recently. The birth of ergonomics and human factors in the modern world has brought the concept of “goodness of fit” to light. Since the late 40’s, ergonomics and human factors have woven their way into the fabric of our society without our awareness, a silent partner in the design of everyday things.

More likely by accident however, ergonomics has become the focus of attention, especially as it relates to Musculoskeletal disorders. The root cause of these injuries often reveal the engineering error that failed to recognize the human factor. The pain felt by a worker in his or her hands and wrists, elbows, neck or back from repetitive tasks, forceful exertions or awkward postures will often drive the pursuit of a solution for a better fit. The chaotic flow of people and papers in a busy work place built without consideration to tasks is in need of organization to maximize productivity and reduce stress. These areas all benefit from ergonomics.

It is the ergonomist that can resolve these issues; who can recognize their root cause and enhance the fit between the worker and machine, the tools and materials used, the tasks performed and the surrounding environment’s impact on the human. The “21st century tailor”, fitting the task to the human with camera and tape measure in hand, sizing up the user for the best fit possible to yield maximum comfort and productivity. The ergonomist is prepared to custom design the workstation to the worker, the hand tool to the hand, fit the chair to the office worker and reduce the extra unnecessary motions in a tedious process.

The ergonomist could be touted as the efficiency expert helping organizations to maximize human potential while minimizing the expense of error, pain, lost time and lost thought due to distraction and poor work design. In today’s world, we need to maximize our fit and performance. To do so, look for the 21st century tailor, today’s ergonomist… fitting the task to the worker one good fit at a time.

Worksite International is now providing expert chair fittings to assist employer clients with finding the right ergonomic chair for employees in need of a better fit. We provide the fit and the referral to the vendor for your convenience. Visit our vendor showroom featuring over 10 different USA and European designs at 2560 Garden Rd, Ste 101 Monterey, CA. To set-up an appointment with one of our 21st century tailors, call 831-648-8724 or visit www.worksiteinternational.com.

The 5th Percentile Employee

Ergonomics is the science of work or the relationship between humans and the workplace including the tools and materials handled, tasks performed and the environment in which it is performed. When humans are creating a place to perform work, it would make sense to consider the physical and mental characteristics of the human users. In essence, the design should match the capacities of the user to allow for:

  • Functional efficiency in productivity

  • Ease of use

  • Comfort

  • Health and Safety

  • Quality of work life

In order to achieve the best match possible in considering the human/machine interface, anthropometrics is important. Anthropometry, or “the measure of man” literally, is the branch of ergonomics that deals with body dimensions such as body size, shape, strength and work capacity. It is that part of ergonomics which is often poorly considered in the design and installation of new facilities and furniture which will be used by humans. An easy example to discuss is the relationship between the computer user and the ergonomic chair.

Many employers believe that one size fits all, at least it appears so as most all furniture and equipment is the same throughout the workplace. However, if we were to apply the concepts of Anthropometry, it would be wise to consider those individuals that don’t quite fit into the average population. Most furniture is designed to fit between the 5th percentile and 90th percentile human. For women, that would be 4’11-5’8 and for men, 5’4” to 6’1”. The 5th percentile employee is that employee which is less than or greater than the range or the remaining 10%. These small or tall stature individuals will not benefit from the ergonomic features and design of most chairs today. The chair simply will not provide the fit and comfort it was meant to provide for all the others. The armrests won’t go up high enough to support the forearms, the chair won’t go low enough for the feet to rest on the floor, etc. By the same token, those individuals that weigh less than the 5th percentile or greater than the 95th percentile will have the same issues, often impacting the safety of the chair as well. Most chair pedestals are not designed to support more than 250 lbs. By exceeding the weight capacity, the warranty in essence is violated and failure of the pedestal could occur, creating a significant liability for you and your employee.

With this in mind, how can an employer be better prepared to accommodate the 5th percentile employee. When buying and selecting furniture including chairs and work surfaces, assess the range of adjustability and ask the product vendor how much of the population will the product support. If the vendor replies all, be skeptical. Features such as height and width adjustable armrests that exceed ANSI 100 standards are helpful, pedestals that go as low as 15”-21”, seat depth adjustments are just a few features that would help. Anticipate that 10% of your workforce will need accommodating and reflect that in your purchase. Your employees and you will benefit from the comfort, quality and productivity achieved. Do you have a 5th percentile employee? We can help you find the right product. 888-288-4463.

Middle Management: Are They Your Weakest Link

In the course of providing ergonomic services and other strategies to business and industry, time and again I have seen clients struggle with gaining the support of its most critical link, supervisors and middle managers. This management entity is often the make or break component of your safety and ergonomics program success or failure and the driving force behind some of your workers’ compensation claims.

Employee relationships with supervisors provide an important social consideration in the causation of WMSD (Work Related Musculoskeletal Disorders). Work environments where supervisors aggressively pursue production, are non-supportive of employee’s and monitor employee’s performance closely cause substantial psychological stress as well as musculoskeletal health complaints (Smith et al, 1992). With increased psychosocial stress, employees are more likely to report symptoms associated with WMSDs. In turn, this dysfunctional relationship drives your claim frequency, occurrence and costs.

Why are supervisors and middle managers unknowingly the weakest link in your safety/ergonomics program? I believe it is a combination of many factors including the following:

  • Priorities are not toward safety.

  • Poor time management in handling safety responsibility.

  • Not tied to performance or accountability.

  • Lack of supportive feedback.

  • No training on the subject.

  • Do not see the value.

  • Lack of upper management support.

  • Do not understand the organization’s program.

  • Lack clear role and responsibilities in the process.

  • Do not trust leadership, employees or each other.

  • Fear of losing power.

  • Lack of self-interest.

So what can be done to strengthen the weakest link in your safety/ergonomics program? Middle managers must have a rational self-interest in such programs if they are expected to support them.

As a result, the following strategies will help to change or strengthen middle management participation in your corporate safety culture.

  • Share with supervisors/managers the overall corporate mission of the program frequently.

  • Align operating beliefs with corporate beliefs.

  • Create a participative management style.

  • Focus on results and rewarding results.

  • Encourage supervisor/employee teams to set standards and goals.

  • Appeal to self-interest to enhance motivation.

  • Maintain program values in concise, simple terms.
  • Assess how people are investing their time, energy and reputations.
  • Engage managers and supervisors in trainings that pertain to safety/ergonomics and gear the instruction specifically to desired outcomes the organization needs from them. (See article “Management Training Strategies for a Stronger Link”.)

By focusing specifically on the supervisor/middle management culture and its impact on the overall organizational culture as it pertains to safety and workplace health, you can expect to see dramatic changes in the perceived value of your safety and health program. These changes will positively impact improved employee/management relationships affecting your workers’ compensation claims and costs as well as productivity and morale.

Reference: Weiss, Alan “Managing for Peak Performance” Las Brisas Research Press, 1994. “Work Related Musculoskeletal Disorders”, Taylor & Frances, 1995

Management Strategies Training For A Stronger Link

In order to enhance middle management participation in your safety/ergonomics program, consider customizing training that addresses pertinent issues for these groups.

Executive training should include:

Supervisors:

  • Ergonomics training.
  • Basic structure and function of the human body at work.
  • Work methods to control/prevent occupational WMSDs.
  • Early recognition signs of WMSDs.
  • Information on medical referral and obtaining ergonomic worksite analysis.
  • Roles and responsibilities in return to work procedures, restricted duty and accommodating injured workers.
  • Understanding and managing the change process, including their role.

Managers:

  • Need for management commitment to reduce or prevent WMSDs and supporting injured workers.
  • Support training of supervisors and workers, set-up of WMSD prevention programs, recognition of work relatedness of WMSD and reinforcement of health and safety rules and principles.
  • Overview of ergonomics and WMSDs within the context of the company’s organization’s goals, polices and procedures.
  • Understand work related injury compensation, experience and cost.
  • Understand accepted standards, guidelines and regulations.
  • Macro ergonomics and system issues.
  • Management of change.
  • Cost expectations of process.
  • If you are interested in strengthening your management link, contact

Worksite International to learn more about our Executive Training Seminars specifically geared towards supervisors and managers. (888) 288-4463 or visit our Services section.

THE CUMULATIVE TIME BOMB OF RSI

Just as back pain often goes unreported as a work injury and instead is reported as a regular absence, so are repetitive strain injuries. Recent studies by the U. of Connecticut found that a random sampling of workers with self-reported discomfort to the neck and upper extremities far exceeded the number of reported claims. Of 292 workers, only 10% actually reported claims. More than half sought treatment, but only 20% were covered by workers’ compensation. 70% used their own insurance and a small percentage paid for care on their own.

Many employers don’t have any reported RSI claims and are therefore not motivated to implement prevention programs. However, the reality is that if employees are working aggressively at computers exceeding 4 hours or more per day and don’t fit quite right in their workstations, they are likely to be experiencing symptoms. As a result, the employer may be facing a cumulative time bomb which could easily result in unwanted RMIs that are severe and costly as employees failed to report early or only reported absent as a result.

The best solution is to encourage employees to come forward with their concerns so that an employer can respond proactively. Preventing the onset saves you 10-20 times the actual cost of an RSI and keeps the bomb squad away!

PRODUCT FEATURE: ERGONOMICS STRETCHING SOFTWARE

Looking for interruption software for your chronic computer users? These tools help to remind you to take frequent computer breaks. Check out the following:

STRETCH BREAK: designed by Paratechnologies, www.paratec.com, 714-546-8619. This program reminds you to take a short stretch break while working at your computer.

CYBERSTRETCH: designed by Jazzercise, www.cyberstretch.com, 760-434-2101. Modeled after “Jazzercise”, this program is an easy-to-use interactive screen saver for the reduction of muscle tension and RSIs.

Call the vendor or Worksite International for a preview of these programs.

 

  WWW.INSITEPT.COM 2000

Websites are useful tools for customers these days and Worksite International’s website is no different. Our site is modified quarterly for our visitors and has recently undergone a full renovation. Our new web design has been modified to reflect your needs. It’s an easy to use format and has the following contents for your convenience.

Our ABOUT Worksite International page introduces you to us, our consultants, our core concepts and practices, some of our customers and frequently asked questions (FAQ). We have a self-viewing presentation available for you as well.

Our PRODUCTS section allows you the convenience of ordering our book and software selections easily by offering you a downloadable order form with a description of our exclusive line of “Your Guide” books. We are now able to accept Visa and MasterCard for your convenience.

In our new SERVICES section, we offer a convenient table for you to point and click on the service description you are most interested in. Our service line offers 12 options for you to choose from as well as customizing your own programs.

In our PUBLICATIONS section, you’ll find our most current newsletter, a list of other published articles written by Alison Heller-Ono and our books for sale. We’ve also archived archived past newsletters as well for your review.

The NEWS AND EVENTS section provides you with a convenient calendar of events associated with Worksite International, ergonomics and workers’ compensation. In addition, our newsletter can be obtained here as well.

The SPEAKING OPPORTUNITIES page offers a comprehensive list of speaking topics available for your group luncheon or conference. Ms. Heller is able to customize a program based on your group’s interest.

Our last section, called

RESOURCES is full of downloadable forms for your convenience. We offer an easy Workstation Evaluation Model for you to use. Our Ergonomic Worksite Analysis Request Form is available to complete and fax to us to request a site visit. Our popular Ergonomic Certification Table is available along with our Product Order Form. We have also provided informative links for you to easily learn more about ergonomics and related issues.

Building and keeping up our website is important to us. We hope you’ll take the time to visit us online and let us know what you think. Send your reply to alisonh@insitept.com. And thank you for stopping by www.insitept.com.

 
RERS: REPETITIVE E-MAIL RESPONSE SYNDROME

Your familiar with CTS and RMIs, well know there is “RERS”, Repetitive 

E-mail Response Syndrome, a term coined here at Worksite International. Silicon 

Valley workers and many others around the world are experiencing a 

substantial increase in mousing and word processing demands in response to

co-workers’ emails. Some receive as many as 600/day. The visual and 

manual effort to view, scroll, sort, point, click, double click and click-delete 

alone increase pointing device use time by up to or exceeding 30% above 

daily task demands for many users. Instead of email, go back to nature. 

Use the telephone, fax, write a note and mail it, or take a walk. It’s likely 

the employee you are trying to reach is just a few cubicles away!

 

 

The Next Disability: Work Related Stress

Fall/Winter 1999

This past decade has been characterized by an increase in such musculo-

skeletal injuries as Repetitive Motion , Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) and 

back injuries. Employers have had to become more in tune with the physical 

demands of work as it relates to an employee’s functional abilities in 

performing the essential work tasks. With the ADA further supporting end 

stage workers’ compensation injuries that impact the worker’s ability to 

perform major life activities, employers have been faced with increasing 

demands to provide reasonable accommodations to these injuries.

 

In the 90’s we saw “bad backs” and CTS fill the #1 and #2 spot on the 

ADA’s most popular reasons for Title 1 discrimination complaints. But 

now, these physical impairments are being replaced by something even 

more elusive. If employers felt difficulty in accommodating employees 

with physical limitations, the challenge to accommodate for mental stress 

and other more severe psychiatric and emotional disabilities is about to 

begin. Move over bad backs, cause here comes work-related stress in the 

21st century. What are some of the drivers behind work-related stress? 

There are many that exist in the work and home. Here are just a few 

to consider:

DRIVERS OF WORK-RELATED STRESS

     Pressure and demands of restructuring and consolidation of 

        resources in business takeovers.

     Fear of termination

     Burn-out as the result of over-working in a “right-sized” company.

     The “Cellular Syndrome” of being available to your employer round 

        the clock or for extended hours beyond the usual 40.

     Increasing episodes of workplace violence, assault, rape and 

        murder in the workplace creating additional anxiety.

     Managing the home and family in the 2 working parent or one 

        parent household.

     Financial demands to earn more money to save for future 

        healthcare, retirement and your child’s education.

     If your organization is rapidly becoming a “stress bucket” of 

        over-worked employees, you can expect your workers’ compensation 

        claims for physical impairments to go up as well as mental.

Here are some tips to help minimize work place stress:

     Network with mental health professionals to better understand 

        the needs of individuals with stress related illnesses.

     Develop reasonable accommodation guidelines and strategies to accommodate.

     Use Employee Assistance Programs

     Develop flexible work schedules

     Train supervisors to be sensitive to stress

 

The ADA and Ergonomics Making Work-Life 
Easier 

(Winter 99)

 

Often workers’ compensation cases move into the realm of the ADA 

because an individual’s work injury impairment is significant enough 

to qualify as a disability. In order for an employee to prove that he/she 

is substantially limited in his/her ability to work, the employee must 

be restricted in his/her ability to perform a class of jobs or a broad 

range of jobs in various classes. If the individual qualifies under the 

ADA, the employer is required to look for reasonable accommodations 

to assist the individual in performing the essential functions of the job.

What exactly is a reasonable accommodation? A reasonable accommodation

(R.A.) assists the disabled worker in completing the work obligations of the 

essential functions of the job. According to the EEOC, the following are 

considered the most common types of accommodations:

  • Making all facilities accessible

  • Providing or modifying equipment

  • Job Restructuring

  • Auxiliary aids: voice activation, TDD

  • Support services

  • Modified work schedules

  • Reassignment to vacant position (if qualified)

Being reasonable implies that it meets the expectations of both the 

employer and the employee and at the same time allows the employee 

to accomplish the essential functions and the purpose

Determining R.A. is perhaps one of the most important tasks an employer 

can do to minimize liability and the threat of an EEOC lawsuit. 

Ergonomics can help in the R.A. process. Ergonomics is about 

matching the abilities and limitations of the worker to what is required 

on the job. By performing an Ergonomic analysis of the work area, 

the employer obtains critical information regarding the physical and 

mental demands of the job. Both the employer and employee can 

then see where the discrepancies are within the job by comparing the 

critical postures and work demands with the workers’ abilities and 

limitations. From this point, the appropriate R.A. can be determined 

and implemented in a timely manner creating a win-win situation for 

all involved parties.

 

If you are concerned about a workers’ compensation case going into 

a charge of ADA discrimination or have a disabled employee who 

requires reasonable accommodation, contact the Job Accommodation 

Network at 1-800-526-7234 or Worksite International for a Reasonable 

Accommodation Assessment at 1-888-288-4463.

 

Back to Table Of Contents

 

 

Developing An Ergonomics Process  

(Fall 98)

 

It’s over a year now since the Cal-OSHA regulation on RMI prevention was 

passed. If you are like most employers that meet the scope of the regulation, 

you are in the throws of developing your compliance strategy. Your 

obligation requires you to perform ergonomic worksite analysis on high 

risk tasks, develop hazard prevention and control measures and train those 

employees exposed to the ergonomic risk factors. There are many options

for employers today to achieve compliance. Anywhere from outside 

consulting assistance to in-house program development. There is a 

variety of interactive software programs, video programs and written 

manuals to assist you in your pursuit of compliance. Worksite International is 

proud to announce the release of a comprehensive, written process 

guide entitled, "Your Guide to Developing an Ergonomics

Process" that can be implemented by your in-house staff or with 

consulting assistance. Since 1993, we have followed Cal-OSHA’s 

pursuit of an ergonomics regulation and have created a start-up kit to 

meet the needs of today’s (California) employer seeking not only 

(Cal-OSHA) compliance, but workers’ compensation cost and claim 

reduction as well as productivity improvements. that can be implemented 

by your in-house staff or with consulting assistance. Since 1993, we have 

followed Cal-OSHA’s pursuit of an ergonomics regulation and have 

created a start-up kit to meet the needs of today’s (California) 

employer seeking not only (Cal-OSHA) compliance, but workers’ 

compensation cost and claim reduction as well as productivity 

improvements.

FEATURES

 

     The ergonomics process kit includes a 370 page primary manual, 7 

        team  workbooks to form an Ergonomics Task Force  and 

        a CD ROM of an impressive array of analysis forms and other  

        documents to assist in  implementation of your ergonomics process.

 

     Office ergonomics, assembly/material handling or laboratory 

        ergonomics, this process kit includes continuous improvement 

        measuring systems for analysis of your ergonomic concerns.

 

    The guide includes 3 overhead training kits on Participatory 

        Ergonomics, How to Develop an Ergonomics Task Force and 

        a comprehensive basic training course on CTD/RMI prevention 

        for employees and supervisors.

 

    A comprehensive list of strategies to address engineering issues, 

        administrative ideas, purchases and employee work practices is 

        included.

 

     A CTD medical management program that has form letters, symptom 

        screens and medical personnel procedures already designed for you 

        to use  with your healthcare providers.

 

     Critical ideas on how to gain administrative management buy-in to 

        your process.

 

    Monitor cost-benefit of the process with key indicators.

 

    Develop an in-house Ergonomics Task Force including roles 

       and responsibilities.

 

Alison Heller-Ono, M.S.P.T., CIE has spent 4 years of research and consultation

developing this guide for today’s employer. Outcomes show $4.50 Return 

on Investment for each $1.00 invested in implementing an Ergonomics 

process. The Guide is available for review at your worksite or at 

Worksite International. To arrange for an appointment, call (888) 288-4463. 

The Kit is published by Lewis Publishers and can be ordered on-line at

 www.crcpress.com (orders@crcpress.com) or through Worksite International.

Back to Table Of Contents

Safety Training Is Serious Business

Spring 1999

 

The Bureau of Labor Statistics reports that safety instruction is the single 

highest percentage of training activity per employee in the nation. 84% of 

employers with >50 employees provided OSHA training last year.

Developing an effective safety and health program requires essential 

training and education for employees to understand the requirements. 

Virtually all of OSHA’s safety regulations require some sort of employee 

training. The Fed-OSHA guidelines support 4 primary elements that 

include (1) management commitment and employee involvement, 

(2) worksite analysis (3) hazard prevention and control measures & (4) 

safety and health training. The primary reason for employers to provide 

training is so that employees understand the hazards they are exposed to 

and how to prevent harm to themselves and others due to exposure as 

well as assure accountability. Supervisors must be trained to carry out 

their safety and health responsibilities too. Supervisors should be able 

to analyze the work under their supervision to identify certain minimum 

standards have been set that require the employer to cover hazard 

communication and accident prevention. These include the following 

elements:

 

     Designate a responsible person(s) for the Safety and Health 

        Administration.

     Implement task specific hazard control measures which apply to 

        employees being trained. Include recognition of hazards, signs and 

        symptoms and employer protection measures.

     Include employee communication such as postings, newsletters, 

        handouts and safety meetings or committees, and supervisor/

        employee interactions.

     Set minimum safe work practice procedures and expectations 

        for employee compliance and as a condition of employment that 

        could result in disciplinary action.

     Provide reminder and training updates at least annually for new 

        employees and for employees who have violated safe work practices 

        or sustained injuries as a result of unsafe acts.

 

Training should include tests or exercises that facilitate adult learning. 

Employers should document in writing the content of training, dates 

occurring, the instructor, employee attendance and evidence that 

employees understand the training. Worksite International has consistently 

provided OSHA compliant training in ergonomics since 1993. 

 

Back to Table Of Contents

Worksite International Celebrates it’s Sixth Anniversary

Spring 1999

 

1999 began our 6th year in business already! Since we opened our doors in

1993, we’ve been able to positively impact over 100 companies and 

at least 1000 employees injury prevention and management. 

Not to shabby for a small start-up!

 

Back to Table Of Contents

 

SAFE COMPUTING WITH LAPTOPS

Summer  1999

 

Remember when you used a computer for the very first time? I was writing 

my master’s thesis and it was 1986. The program was Word Perfect. How 

strange that all felt then. Now computers are ubiquitous today compared 

to those days 13 years ago. Almost every electronic product we use has a 

computer in it. If your like me, you have at least 1-3 computers available to 

use at any time with at least one of them being a laptop computer. I find 

it confusing sometimes to decide where to put my information. I ponder 

when, if at all to carry the laptop with me. After all, I am already carrying 

a briefcase full of files throughout the day. Isn’t the pen still mightier 

than the sword if not the computer?

 

Since we are using computers more and more, laptop use is also becoming 

more common. As a global economy, we pack our computers like we 

pack our toothbrush. So, it’s important we use them as naturally as 

possible. By naturally I mean work as close to neutral as possible as the 

same basic ergonomic principles in the office apply with the laptop. 

It is sometimes more challenging as we don’t always have the room we 

need to set up properly for use. In addition, carrying the little gray box 

comfortably can also pose significant hazards to the neck and upper 

extremities. So here are some safety tips for computing with your laptop:

 

     Minimize eye fatigue and strain by taking "mini breaks" by focusing 

        on a distant object for a few seconds before continuing to work.

     Adjust the angle of the monitor screen to reduce direct light 

        sources and glare.

     Keep your head in a comfortable position, not overly turned or 

        tilted. Angle the screen so that it is perpendicular to your line of sight. 

        If you raise your laptop, make sure you can still keep your wrists in 

        neutral.

     Change positions often to avoid discomfort and muscle fatigue. 

        If you feel soreness, take your hands away and stop and rest.

     Take periodic breaks and stretch your arms, hands and fingers.

     Type wit a light touch and avoid pounding the keys.

     Maintain your wrists in neutral and keep your elbows close to your side. 

     Be sure to adjust the work surface or seat height with pillows or your 

        briefcase

     Carry your laptop in a sturdy bag with a shoulder strap that is cushioned 

        over the shoulder. Change sides often. Don’t overload your self 

        as they can weigh up to 8 lbs.

 

Back to Table Of Contents

OSHA Updates

Fed-OSHA Summer 2003

Fed-OSHA announced its 5 year strategic goal this past May 2003. The goal is to reduce workplace fatalities by 15% and decrease injuries and illnesses 20% by 2008. That is a lofty goal and will require every employer to make a serious commitment of manpower, money and creativity to drive change in their safety and health programs including workers’ compensation. OSHA plans to get more involved and promote a culture of safety and health to ensure its effectiveness.

OSHA also released the second draft of the retail grocery store ergonomic guidelines and is now asking for additional comments during July 2003. The poultry processing guidelines were also released and reflect the earlier published meat packers guidelines of the early 90’s. Both of these tools offer invaluable advice for any employer, not just industry specific advice. Visit www.osha.gov.

The National Advisory Committee on Ergonomics presented its first set of work plans to OSHA focusing on guidelines, outreach , assistance and research.

Also, many proposed ergonomic regulations have been delayed or staled this summer including Minnesota and Connecticut. California is still considering reform of 5110.

 

CAL-OSHA UPDATE

The California Labor Federation has recently been petitioning the Cal-OSHA Standards Board to revisit Section 5110 (RMI Standard) and give consideration to a comprehensive, hazard-based, preventive approach to RMIs. The petition supports the revision of the current standard to include certain elements of the state’s IIPP required by Title 8 section 3202 (effective in 1990). In other words, any hazards from repetitive motion or other ergonomic risk factors shall be addressed through the

Employer’s Injury and Illness Prevention Program (IIPP). Worksite International has always supported the integration of an employers’ ergonomics program to fall under their IIPP. In general, the petition suggests that the scope of the regulation be changed by eliminating the need to incur more than one repetitive motion injury from an identical task. The petition supports ergonomic worksite analysis, hazard control measures and training as the means for an employer to identify and prevent RMIs. From 1998-2001, there have been over 100 citations for ergonomic violations totaling more than $180,000.00 in employer penalties.

The hearing is scheduled for Feb. 20, 2003 at 10:00 am in Sacramento at the State Resources Building. Call 916-274-5721 to learn more.

 

 

Fed OSHA Ergonomics: Voluntary or Mandatory?

The voluntary ergonomics guidelines passed this April continue to be hotly debated in the Senate as to its legitimacy as a voluntary rule. A bipartisan group of senators introduced S2184 that would require the federal government to promulgate a new ergonomics standard within two years. The bill, created by J. Breaux (D-LA) and Arlene Specter (R-PA) states the regulation should only cover work-related injuries, should clearly define the circumstances requiring an employer’s compliance, training, education and outreach. Furthermore, the bill stipulates the rule should not interfere with state worker’ compensation laws as the previous standard did under the Clinton administration. The next standard must be uniquely different from the last one as stipulated in the Congressional Review Act. The next consideration of the rule will occur in Fiscal 2003. An Appropriations bill, S. 2766 indicates that not less than $2 million should be allocated to provide for the re-issuance of a rule related to ergonomics by the Secretary of Labor.

Industry guidelines to include nursing homes, grocery stores and poultry processing industries are planned for release this year for voluntary compliance.

The Cal-OSHA Ergonomics Standard may get a facelift if AB2845 passes by July 2003. The bill is sponsored by organized labor to revise the 5110 RMI standard previously passed in July 1997

 

FED-OSHA ERGONOMICS UPDATE Fall 2002

This past April, OSHA announced a new comprehensive plan to reduce Musculoskeletal disorders. The plan includes four approaches: industry targeted guidelines, tough enforcement measures, compliance assistance and outreach, and ergonomics research. The latest announcement comes after much criticism. The new guidelines are voluntary however OSHA plans to enforce based on the General Duty Clause. Employers will continue to be inspected by OSHA to look for serious ergonomic violations and citations will be given . OSHA hopes to begin releasing industry specific ergonomic guidelines that will be used to assist employers in recognizing and controlling ergonomics hazards. The new industry guidelines will offer more flexibility for employers to implement ergonomics programs to suit their individual needs rather than the “ one size fits all” approach that failed last year. Guidelines for reducing MSDs in nursing homes will be out later this year.

OSHA’s new plan also includes compliance assistance tools to help reduce and prevent workplace injuries. Model ergonomics programs will be available for employer use. In addition, OSHA plans to focus on Hispanic and other immigrant workers exposed to high hazard industries. OSHA and NIOSH hope to encourage additional studies to assess the benefits of ergonomics as well.

OSHA Update Winter 2002

The Labor Department will address workplace repetitive stress injuries this fall, 2002. An announcement is expected to come from Elaine Chao. The new OSHA administrator, John Henshaw said ergonomics continues to be one of the workplace hazards that needs attention but it would not be the only issue of his administration. Recent terrorist events delayed any announcement OSHA and the DOL were planning to make. Even without any federal standard on ergonomics, OSHA can still enforce violations of unsafe workplaces related to poor ergonomics under the “general duty clause”. California continues to be one of two states with an active regulation.

OSHA UPDATE Summer 2001

With the recent tragic events of September 11th and the onset of the new war, Fed OSHA has been busy addressing issues at the WTC in New York City. Previously, OSHA was to review the comments received from the summer hearings and provide an action plan. This action has been delayed now. There is talk of a senate bill that has been written that would require the DOL to form a new ergonomic standard within two years. Information regarding this bill is sketchy for now. It is clear however that ergonomics is on the back burner. The staggering costs in workers’ compensation injury claims from physical and mental injuries including stress claims and death benefits will take center stage for now. Worksite International is deeply moved by the tragedy and has included a special section, “A Tribute to Heroes”.

 

OSHA ERGONOMICS Spring 2001 UPDATE

The Federal Ergonomics regulation was repealed this past March by both the House of Representatives and the Senate as well as President Bush. After 10 years of research and promotion of the benefits, the largest worker protection clause ever created was voted out. It’s demise was attributed to its content which exceeded 600 pages, the excessive burden of cost and implementation it would have brought to 4.75 million businesses as well as the conflict it created with each individual states’ workers’ compensation laws. The regulation may be gone for now, but there is talk of another in the future. OSHA will likely continue to site employers for ergonomics violations under the General Duty Clause as they have done since the mid-80’s. None the less, ergonomics continues to be regulated in California, since 1997. All employers in the state of California with more than one repetitive motion injury , diagnosed by an MD within 12 months is accountable.

To Federalize Ergonomics Or Not: That is The Question?

The controversy that has followed the Ergonomics Standard over the last few years continues to plague it in its final days as approval is sought. For those of you who have followed the tail of the Standard, here is a quick list of 10 reasons for and against the support of the regulation.

Reasons against:

  1. There is no sound scientific research.
  2. It is too broad and costly.
  3. It is a waste of money compared with cooperative and educational programs.
  4. OSHA should seek more non-regulatory alternatives.
  5. Many manufacturing businesses believe they will have to lay-off workers or consider moving employees out of the USA.
  6. The regulation should focus on business with the highest injury rates.
  7. The way it is currently drafted, employers are concerned there will be more employee fraud as workers can be compensated for minor aches and pains.
  8. The House Appropriations Committee may try and block funding of the regulation in FY2001 as they believe it does not include Federal employees; is not substantiated by science and should wait for the NAS study to be done in 2001.
  9. It interferes with state workers’ compensation laws regarding pre-existing conditions and differentiating work injury from home injury.
  10. Small businesses lack the resources and knowledge to implement the standard.

Despite the 10 reasons listed above there are contrary points to each to support the regulation and its efforts.

 

Supportive reasons:

  1. Major studies (>5,000) describe a scientific cause/effect relationship between repetitive motion and other risk factors and RMIs/CTDs.
  2. The regulation addresses the concerns of small business by exempting business with 10 or less employees from record keeping, excluding agriculture, construction and maritime.
  3. The implementation time to perform job hazard analyses is extended to 2 years and for permanent measures, 3 years.
  4. A quick fix option implemented within 90 days and found successful within 30 days will not require full program compliance.
  5. The Standard is expected to prevent 3 million MSDSs in 10 years and save $9.1 billion per year far out weighing the costs of $4.2 billion per year.
  6. Employee perpetrated fraud occurs in <2% of workers’ compensation cases and would not necessarily lead to increase claim reporting or benefit costs.
  7. The NAS study is a political stall tactic.
  8. Employers will continue to make decisions on “recordable” injuries and whether the injuries were related to repetitive motion.
  9. OSHA has tried using educational and voluntary programs for several years without much impact.
  10. Many employers have successfully implemented ergo strategies with great benefit to workers’ compensation claims costs and productivity.

 

AFL-CIO SUPPORTS FED OSHA PROPOSED ERGO-REG

The AFL-CIO said women make up 46% of the workforce and 33% of those people are injured at work. Women are most often impacted by Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Tendonitis. Many also suffer injuries from overexertion. Despite opposition from big business and Congress, the AFL-CIO supports the proposed rule and is pleased with the “one tolerance” approach to take action before more workers are injured. OSHA’s written comment period was extended an extra 30 days with public hearings being held over the next few months, including one in Portland, Oregon this Spring. 

Excerpted from Workplace Ergonomics News

 
Federal OSHA Ergonomics Update

Fall/Winter 1999

The proposed Federal Ergonomics regulation was released late November, 

1999 with much hoopla by the media. There is a buzz about town as a result. 

In essence, it will cover 27 million workers, prevent 300,000 RMIs/year, 

impact 2 million work places. Required compliance by manufacturing and 

material handling facilities is included while other employers with 1 injury 

related to poor ergonomics must comply. As written, the standard exceeds 

CA.’s Ergo Reg. Indicating our need to meet more stringent demands if 

passed. Anticipated investment projections indicate an employer will invest 

about $2000/year on ergonomic changes to meet compliance.

Back to Table Of Contents

Cal-OSHA Ergonomics Update

Winter  1999

 

As we begin the New Year, the Cal-OSHA RMI regulation remains under 

appeal but still regarded as the most substantial state ergonomics 

regulation to date. As predicted, other states are following on CA.’s 

coattails. North Carolina and Washington have proposed their own 

ergonomics regulations. On the Federal Ergonomics debate, the latest 

draft would require compliance from more than 2.5 million US businesses 

when a single CTD is logged. The proposed program-based standard is 

estimated to cost US businesses more than $4 billion to implement. 

The latest proposal will not contain a typing/keying component. The focus 

would lean more towards general industry, manufacturing and manual 

materials handling. Release date is targeted for summer, 1999.

Back to Table Of Contents

Posting Your Cal-OSHA Logs 

(Winter  1999)

 

During the month of February each year, many employers are required 

to post Cal/OSHA Form 200 in a conspicuous place. This log and 

summary of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses documents details 

about on-the-job injuries and illnesses that occurred between 

January 1 and December 31 of the preceding year. Unless you are in 

a designated low-hazard industry, you’re required to complete and post 

the log if you have 11 or more employees at any time during 

1997. Remember to fold the form to keep the names confidential.

 

Back to Table Of Contents

(Spring  1999)

 

This past February, Fed-OSHA released it’s much debated draft National 

Ergonomics Standard. The primary focus is on manufacturing and manual 

material handling industries. It is unclear as to whether data entry jobs 

will be covered or not. It is agreed that there is substantial scientific research 

that demonstrates a causal relationship between workplace hazards and 

WMSDs (work-related musculoskeletal disorders). It is also known that the 

control of the exposures results in reduced work injury incidence and severity. 

The standard sets 2 levels of response. The first level requires surveillance 

and applies to manufacturing and material handling. The second level 

applies to all employers (continued back page) and is triggered by the 

identification of an OSHA recordable incidence of WMSD. Once the 

incident occurs, the employer must implement management leadership 

and employee involvement, hazard identification/information as well 

as job hazard analysis and control, training and medical management. 

Program evaluation is also required. It is unclear just how the Federal 

guideline will relate to California’s almost 2 year old regulation. Debate 

will continue for sometime through the end of this year. Employers 

should expect the Federal regulation by early 2000 with public hearings 

this summer. More to come for sure!!!!!!!!

Back to Table Of Contents

Federal OSHA Ergonomics Update

(Summer  1999)

 

The debate over the federal ergonomics regulation continues with 

representatives feuding over whether to support the Nat’l Academy 

of Sciences study on ergonomics. The study would further delay the 

standard another 2 years. The regulation is already supported by 

over 2000 studies regarding the relationship between ergonomic 

risk factors and CTDs. The standard has substantial support by 

the American Nurses Assoc., the Am. College of Occup. Medicine 

and other credentialed organizations. These organizations see the 

standard as a benefit to our national workforce as many businesses 

have already  implemented successful programs to reduce ergonomic 

injuries.

 

Back to Table Of Contents

Fed OSHA Record Keeping

(Summer  1999)

 

A new Fed-OSHA record keeping regulation is expected out October 1, 

1999 and is likely to have a major impact on the business community. 

Cal-OSHA is preparing to adopt a standard at least as effective as the 

federal rule within 3-6 months of its release or shortly after the new 

year. The rule will spell out revised procedures for recording workplace 

injuries and illnesses. It is anticipated that it will significantly impact 

employers as it is an entirely new system and will likely take substantial 

time to prepare the employer community, especially with concern over 

the Y2K bug arriving around the same time. Employers should anticipate 

other changes as well to a consultation draft rule and a revised tuberculosis standard this fall, all expected to impact CA. businesses.

 

 

OSHA and Small Business: www.osha.gov

 

Back to Table Of Contents

Product Features

ERGONOMIC SHOWROOM FEATURE:

Kensington has rolled out a full line of new computer accessories in 2003 to include changes to some of their more familiar products. The Orbit trackball has been re-engineered and now is available with an optical ball. The Pocketpro mouse is a small portable USB mouse for laptop use. Visit www.kensington.com to see more of their unique and inventive products.

Contour Design has released a new Perfit Mouse Optical also and offers ergonomically designed features. Visit www.contourdesign.com to learn more.

A new ergonomics magazine was launched this spring, ErgoSolutions Magazine. It is designed as a resource for leaders in workplace ergonomics from the in-house safety officer or ergonomist, to the supervisor responsible for ergonomics to the facilities manager or purchasing agent. This magazine is filled with timely articles, new product previews and loads of ideas to get your ergonomics program jump started. It is published by Snow and Sea Media in Denver, Co. To advertise or to receive a copy of this fine publication, call 720-987-6701.

 

ERGONOMIC PRODUCT SHOWROOM

KEYSTONE OF NEW WORKSITE INTERNATIONAL CORPORATE OFFICE

On February 1, 2003 Worksite International opened its new corporate office at 9 Soledad Dr. in Monterey, Ca. The office has an exclusive ergonomic vendor showroom with over 15 different vendors and 30 types of ergonomic products from chairs to workstations to alternative keyboards and pointing devices. Participating vendors include Hag, Workrite Ergonomics, Kinesis, Office Master, Neutral Posture, SIS Human Factors, VuRyte, Goldtouch, Contour Designs, Harter, DACO mats, Humanscale, Para technologies, RSIGuard, EISYS and GB Products International. Many more are expected to participate as well. The showroom is open for custom chair and workstation fittings as well as alternative product consults. Contact Worksite International for an appointment by calling 888-288-4463 or visit during the open house on Thursday, April 24th from 4-7 pm. Dr. Jerome Congleton of Neutral Posture will be our special guest.

 

WORKRITE ERGONOMICS WORKSTATIONS

Workrite Ergonomics has rolled out their new Work Center Catalog with an impressive line of electric and cantilever height adjustable surfaces. The Sonoma line is a high end work center that offers a system approach to workstation design with panel supports, pedestals and accessories. The 24-52 inch height range accommodates from below the 5th to above the 95th percentile worker. The Econolift and the Neutralift round out the collection. 800-959-9675. www.wrea.com.

 

 

Rollermouse Station

by Contour Design, Inc.

The Contour Roller mouse is an innovative new option to a computer mouse and a remarkable simple solution to use. The design places the cursor control just below the space bar of any standard keyboard making data entry faster, safer and more comfortable for right or left handed computer users. The Roller mouse offers a Rollerbar technology that glides and moves like the mouse without having to lift the hand away from the keyboard. The Rollermouse offers 3 programmable buttons also. Call 1-800-462-6678 for more details or visit www.contourdesign.com.

RSIGuard Software:

Leave it to an injured software engineer to design a software that addresses the onset of repetitive motion injuries. RSIGuard software allows the user to customize his/her computer to meet individual data entry needs. The software can be set to provide breaks at regular intervals or monitor mouse/keying speed, intensity and duration and to reduce the onset of symptoms in the hands related to keying and mouse use. The software offers many programmable features including an “auto-mouse click” which eliminates the need to click the mouse. It also includes stretching instructions and tracks usage statistics. Goldtouch offers a 45-day evaluation and discounts for non-profit and educational organizations. The product also works well with Goldtouch’s alternative keyboard and mouse accessories. 949-798-0300. Available from Goldtouch Technologies htpp://www.rsiguard.com.

The Swopper

“Sitting in Motion”

By Aeris

Leave it to the Europeans to design an innovative stool that allows you to move feely while seated. The Swopper offers a spiral spring pedestal that gives with your body height and weight when seated. The adjustable gas lift can be set to a comfortable height and weight that allows the feet to remain on the floor. The spring pedestal allows for lateral mobility necessary when reaching. Use of the Swopper is recommended to begin at 2 hours and increase slowly. This design is ideal for assembly and manufacture work at a counter that involves reach.

Come visit the Swopper and more at our Showroom in Monterey.

 

Organizational Tools for the Work Surface

Document support and storage is an important aspect of office ergonomics. The tidiness of one’s desk helps to recall paper placement. Use of vertical and horizontal organizing tools aid in remembering the location of key documents.

Abbot Office Systems offers innovative products for organizing the business and home office. Call (800) 631-2233 to receive a catalogue of their products

 

Laptop Products for Improved Ergonomics

In an effort to improve laptop ergonomics, here are some recent 

products to minimize poor ergonomics.

     The Lapadaptor: portable document holder for portable 

        laptops. www.tifaq.org.

     The LapDog: a padded carrying case that doubles as a 

        workstation with fold out pockets for mousing room and 

        storage. www.sjdesigns.com

     The LaptopCoPilot: for working in the car. A bracket is 

        offered that clips the laptop to the steering wheel. 

        www.laptopcopilot.com.

WorkRITE Ergonomics

(Winter  1999)

When your specifications call for aesthetically pleasing and 

functional ergonomic accessories that install easily on new or 

existing office workstation, consider the advantages WorkRite 

Ergonomics offers. Keyboard trays of all styles and types are offered 

through WorkRite as well as adjustable work surfaces and monitor 

supports. Workrite will also custom design an ergonomic solution 

specific to your furniture needs.. Check out their web site at  

www.wrea.com or call 415-884-2311 for a catalogue of their 

latest accessories.

Back to Table Of Contents

Interactive Ergonomic Software Programs

(Fall 98)

An innovative solution to implementing ergonomics in the workplace 

is offered through interactive ergonomic software programs. These 

programs allow employees to often analyze and be trained at their 

worksite on their own schedule using their own computer. They offer 

work practice monitoring and educational development while 

minimizing employee time commitment to training. Management 

reports are often included with these programs. Check out the 

following websites or contact us for more details.

Back to Table Of Contents

Ergonomics Software Web Sites

     Washington Ergonomics: William Brough 253-839-4624. 

        www. wshingtonergonomics.com/sware.htm

     Corpmed: Kevin Byrne, M.D., M.P.H. 303-469-8997. 

        http://www.corpmed.com

     Ergotrack: www.ergotrack.com

     Proformix Systems 800-973-2739

 

Back to Table Of Contents

Industrial and Occupational Ergonomics 
Encyclopedia CD-ROM

(Fall 98)

The University of Cincinnati and the Editors of the International 

Journal of  Industrial Engineering have compiled a new CD-ROM for

practitioners of ergonomics, young and old. The editors recruited over 

100 authors from around the world (including Alison) to write chapters 

for the encyclopedia. As a reference tool, the encyclopedia is organized 

into alphabetical headings A-Z. Topics range from tendinitis to control 

panels to shiftwork and a multitude of others. The CD sells for $44.00 

and is slightly more for corporations. Call 513-556-2652 or 

Worksite International to order.

Back to Table Of Contents

Ergonomic Review Of Armrests

(Summer 1999)

www. humanics-es.com/armrest.htm

Rani Leuder of Humanics Ergosystems, Inc. provides an excellent 

review of the ins and outs of armrests. For years, employers have 

debated whether to purchase chairs with the support. Here are a few 

reasons why we should use armrests:

     Armrests affect more than the arms by providing essential support 

        to the hand-arm-should-neck system.

     Armrests relieve loads on the neck, shoulders and arms by 

        providing support that can alleviate static muscle loads preventing

        neck, shoulder and arm pain.

     Armrests help to alleviate stress on the back by reducing the load 

        on the spine by about 10%. Armrests also help to reduce stress on

         the  trunk and lower limbs when rising from sit to stand or 

        returning to sit.

Back to Table Of Contents

"Your Guide to Office Ergonomic Furniture and 
Accessories" by Alison Heller-Ono M.S.P.T., CIE

(Summer 199

 

Purchasing and using office ergonomic furniture and accessories is very 

confusing in today’s market. Ms. Heller has re-edited this guide and updated 

all the features with new photos , additional topics and a list of national vendors. 

 

The guide is written for end-user consumers, purchasing managers and 

facilities managers who frequently must select these products. The guide 

details some of the most commonly purchased items such as ergonomic chairs, 

posture boards, headsets, alternative keyboards and pointing devices. The 

book details the intent of the product, limitations, options, usage and other 

information. The new guide is available for $35.00. 70 pages. Contact 

Worksite International to order. 888-288-4463.


Back to Table Of Contents

FYI Web Sites

 

The following industry-related sites are for information. Click 

on the links to access these sites.

 

Site Description

Address

Anyone interested in learning more about chronic pain including  the diagnosis  and treatment of it can access a world of useful information  http:// www. pain.com

Job Accommodation Network

http://www.janweb.wvu.edu/

ADA Home Page

http://www.usdoj/crt/ada/adahom l.htm

Keyboard Macros

http://www.synapseadaptive.com/

tools/win95%20keyboard%  20shortcuts.html

CTD Resource Network - 

Typing Injury FAQ

http://www.tifaq.org

Ergocon99

http://www.engr.sjsu.edu/ergocon/

International Association for the Study of Pain http://www.halcyon.com/iasp
OSHA and Small Business http://www.osha.gov
Board of Certification in Professional Ergonomics http://www.bcpe.org.
Proposed North Carolina Ergonomics Regulation: www.dol.state.nc.us/news/ergostd.htm.
OSHA self-audit software www.osha-slc.gov/dts/osta/oshasoft/
State of Washington proposed ergonomics rule http://www.lni.wa.gov/wisha/ergo/rule_ dev/ergoprop.htm
CA. Ergonomics regulation update http://www.dir.ca.gov/oshsb/ergo_stand_status.html.
offers joy stick and hand grip solutions. www.cyber-tech.net
Offers educational software on RMI prevention. www.ergo-man.com

Safety and ergonomic news updates.

www.safetyonline.com
Alternative healthcare information site. www.123relax.com
Computer Vision Syndrome information site. www.Dr.Sheedy.com

 

Back to Table Of Contents

 

See something that interests you in our newsletter or have a question? Call us. 888-288-4463 or Fax 408-648-8330. E-mail us at: alisonh@insitept.com or check the web at www.insitept.com. any way we can.